Milwaukee Judge Strikes Down Limits for Non-Economic Damages in Medical Malpractice Cases

On Friday, October 3, Milwaukee County Judge Jeffrey Conen issued an order and decision in which he struck down Wisconsin’s $750,000 limit for non-economic damages medical malpractice cases. The case is Mayo v. Wisconsin Injured Patients Compensation Fund, et al., 2012CV006272 (Oct. 3, 2014). Background The plaintiff, Ascaris Mayo, went to the emergency room suffering […]

Continue Reading ›

Court Upholds Statutory Damages Limit for UW Physicians

On September 24, the Court of Appeals, Dist. IV located in Madison held that the statutory limit of $250,000 on damage awards against state employees, including University of Wisconsin Hospital physicians, was constitutional. The case is Fiez v. Keevil, 2013AP2711 (Sept. 24, 2014). Background Defendant Robert Keevil, a physician employed by the University of Wisconsin Medical […]

Continue Reading ›

TIF and Structured Settlement Payments Study Committees to Meet Next Week

Two Legislative Council Study Committees will be meeting next week on Thursday, October 9, at the Wisconsin State Capitol, and Hamilton Consulting will be there to follow the proceedings. The Study Committee on the Review of Tax Incremental Financing will meet at 10 AM on Thursday in Room 413 North. At the meeting, members of […]

Continue Reading ›

Wisconsin Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Case Dealing with Non-Compete Agreements

On Wednesday, October 1, the Wisconsin Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case that involves an important issue to Wisconsin employers who hire employees on an at-will basis and seek to protect themselves with non-competition, confidentiality, and non-solicitation agreements (hereinafter, “Non-Competes” or “Agreements”). The opinion of a Milwaukee County Circuit Court that is under […]

Continue Reading ›

Wisconsin State Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Civil Liability Cases

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has begun to hear oral arguments for the 2014-15 term, including cases involving civil liability issues. Below is a summary of three cases of interest to Wisconsin businesses. Court to Decide Meaning of “Owner in Dog Bite Case Court to Determine Whether Manure is a Pollutant for Insurance Policies Court […]

Continue Reading ›

Court to Decide Meaning of “Owner” in Dog Bite Case

The Wisconsin Supreme Court earlier this month heard oral arguments in a case deciding whether the defendant is an “owner” and thus liable for damages caused by a dog at the home he owned, but in which he did not live. The case is Augsburger v. Homestead Mut. Ins., 2012AP641.   Background The defendant owned […]

Continue Reading ›

Wisconsin Supreme Court to Determine Manure as a Pollutant for Insurance Policies

On Friday, September 12, the Wisconsin Supreme Court heard a number of cases dealing with the issue of whether septage is a “pollutant” that triggers the pollution exclusions in the insurers’ policies. Below is a discussion of the cases heard by the Supreme Court.   Background In the first case (Preisler v. Kuettel’s Septic Service, […]

Continue Reading ›

Wis. Supreme Court to Determine Worker’s Compensation Case

The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday, September 23 in a case that will decide whether the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) preempts the State of Wisconsin from imposing penalties for safety violations under Wisconsin laws.    Background An employee (Tonya Wetor) was injured on the job while working at […]

Continue Reading ›

Study Committee on Transfer of Structured Settlements

The Legislative Council has convened a summer study committee that has legislators and public members reviewing the transfer of structured settlement payments. The committee has been meeting since late July to hear presentations from Wisconsin and national professionals who handle structured settlement agreements. By late 2014, the committee plans to submit legislation to the Wisconsin […]

Continue Reading ›

Courts Split on ACA Tax Subsidies

On July 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck a blow to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) when it held that the ACA did not authorize the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to provide tax credits for health insurance purchased on federal health exchanges. That same day, the U.S. Court […]

Continue Reading ›