Study Committee on Transfer of Structured Settlements

The Legislative Council has convened a summer study committee that has legislators and public members reviewing the transfer of structured settlement payments. The committee has been meeting since late July to hear presentations from Wisconsin and national professionals who handle structured settlement agreements. By late 2014, the committee plans to submit legislation to the Wisconsin […]

Continue Reading ›

Courts Split on ACA Tax Subsidies

On July 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck a blow to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) when it held that the ACA did not authorize the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to provide tax credits for health insurance purchased on federal health exchanges. That same day, the U.S. Court […]

Continue Reading ›

Supreme Court Rules that Federal Law Preempts State Negligence Claims Against Railroad Company

In a 5-2 decision authored by Justice Prosser, joined by Justices Crooks, Roggensack, Ziegler, and Gableman, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a parade and resultant parade traffic leading to a train collision with a vehicle did not qualify as an exception to preemption under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA). Chief Justice Abrahamson authored […]

Continue Reading ›

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Op-ed – “Vets Favor New State Asbestos Law”

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Sunday, July 20, published an op-ed by Wisconsin veterans Larry Kutschma and Steven Stefonik voicing their support for the new asbestos transparency law (2013 Wisconsin Act 154). The op-ed responded to a call by gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke to repeal the new law. According to Kutschma and Stefonik: As veterans, […]

Continue Reading ›

Court can Compel Employee to Accept Settlement Offer under Worker’s Comp Law

In a 5-2 decision authored by Justice Roggensack, joined by Justices Crooks, Prosser, Ziegler, and Gableman, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a circuit court may compel an employee to accept a settlement offer under Wisconsin’s worker’s compensation law (Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1)). Justice Bradley authored a dissenting opinion and was joined by Chief Justice […]

Continue Reading ›

Court Holds Plaintiff’s Insurer Must Defend and Indemnify the Defendant

In a troubling 4-3 decision authored by Chief Justice Abrahamson, joined by Justices Crooks, Bradley, and Prosser, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the plaintiff’s insurance carrier, American Family Insurance, had a duty to defend and indemnify the tortfeasor because the torfeasor was a “permissive user” of the plaintiff’s vehicle under American Family’s policy. Justice […]

Continue Reading ›

“Lemon Law King” Loses

In a 5-1 decision authored by Justice Ziegler and joined by Justices Crooks, Bradley, Prosser, and Gableman (Chief Justice Abrahamson dissenting and Justice Roggensack not participating), the Wisconsin Supreme Court handed the self-proclaimed “Lemon Law King” a defeat by refusing to award him attorney’s fees in a lawsuit. The case is Betz v. Diamond Jim’s […]

Continue Reading ›

Seventh Circuit Strikes Down Wisconsin’s Campaign Finance Rules

In an 88-page decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit struck down a number of provisions under Wisconsin’s campaign finance law, as well as rules issued by the Government Accountability Board. The case is Wisconsin Right to Life v. Barland. Judge Diane Sykes, writing for the three-judge majority, began the decision by […]

Continue Reading ›

Wisconsin Lauded for “Common Sense” Legal Reforms

 Lisa Rickard, President of the U.S. Chamber of Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), recently wrote an article (“Wisconsin: Capital of Common Sense”), in which she commends Gov. Scott Walker and the Wisconsin Legislature for leading the nation over the past three years in enacting civil justice reforms. As Rickard notes: During the current decade, Governor […]

Continue Reading ›

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Act 10

In September, we reported that the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin upheld Wisconsin Act 10, also known as the Budget Repair Bill. The plaintiffs failed to prove that Act 10 improperly restricts collective bargaining rights, and that Act 10 violates the Equal Protection Clause by treating individuals represented by a collective […]

Continue Reading ›