

Budget
Overview: A WEDA Perspective
Jim Hough & Amy Boyer
September
2001
(Reprinted from Wisconsin Economic
Development Association (WEDA) newsletter, the WEDA Wire. It is an
overview of economic development issues debated in the context of the
2001-03 Biennial Budget, Act 9, which was signed into law on Aug. 30,
2001.)
As with most
state budgets, there's the good, the bad and even sometimes the ugly. The
measure of a state budget is also not limited to what is in the final
package. A final assessment must also include a review of proposals that
were seriously considered (i.e. included in the Governor, Joint Finance,
Senate, Assembly or Conference Committee Version) but not ultimately
adopted.
Among the "good" items that did not survive were
changes to a single sales factor for determining corporate franchise and
income tax liability and changes to utility shared revenue tax to provide
incentives to local governments to host power plants. Sales tax on custom
computer software was a "bad" idea that did not survive the
final cut. Two "ugly" proposals adopted by the Senate, combined
tax reporting and changes to the TIF laws, were rejected by the Assembly
and Conference Committee.
There was a mixed bag on mandated set asides
that were added at several stages in the process. WEDA had urged the
Governor to veto all set-asides in the Wisconsin Development Fund,
Brownfields Grant Program, and the TEA Program. WEDA's veto requests were
based on the integrity of the process and not on the merits or demerits of
the respective projects. The Governor vetoed some, for the right reasons,
but not all of the set-asides. WEDA also supported a 4.1% increase in the
Wisconsin Technical College budget, based primarily on the need for
training and re-training of our workforce. The Technical College System
received neither a funding increase nor decrease.
Below is a
detailed look at what transpired during the recent budget process
involving many item of interest to WEDA members and includes most of the
items in which WEDA played an active role.
2001
Wisconsin Act 16 - Biennial Budget Bill
Governor
Scott McCallum introduced his biennial budget bill (SB 55) on February 20,
2001. The bill was then referred to the Joint Committee on Finance,
comprised of 8 Republicans and 8 Democrats. The Joint Committee on Finance
reported the bill out of Committee on June 18 on a vote of 12-4. Next, the
Senate Democrat Caucus established its position on the budget and passed the
bill as amended on June 19 on a party line 18-13 vote. The Assembly
Republican Caucus established its position on the budget and passed the bill
as amended on June 29 by a vote of 61-38.
A Conference Committee, made up of
4 Republicans and 4 Democrats was formed to resolve over 800 items of
difference between the Senate and Assembly. Conference Committee Amendment 1
was developed by the Conferees and subsequently passed in the Assembly
(75-24) and the Senate (25-8) on July 26. The Governor delivered his veto
message and signed the bill on Thursday, August 30 as 2001 Wisconsin Act 16.
Summarized
below are actions on items of interest to WEDA.
Taxes
Single
Sales Factor. SB
55 contained a three-year phase-in to a single sales factor to apportion
corporations' income to Wisconsin to determine corporate franchise and
income tax liability.
Joint Finance - Approved with a delayed effective date to the next
biennium.
Senate - Deleted the provision.
Assembly - Approved the Joint Finance version.
Conference Committee - Deleted the provision. No change to current
law.
Sales Tax on
Custom Computer Software. SB 55 proposed to make the sale of
custom computer software subject to the sales and use tax. Currently,
off-the-shelf software is subject to sales tax, however, customized software
is not. Estimated fiscal impact $52 million.
Joint Finance - No change to Governor's proposal.
Senate - Adopted Governor's proposal.
Assembly - Deleted the provision.
Conference Committee - Deleted the provision. No change to current
law.
Combined
Reporting.
Senate - Adopted a provision requiring members of an affiliated group
engaged in a unitary business to compute state corporate income and
franchise taxes using the combined reporting method of determining income.
Effective for tax years starting on or after January 1, 2002. Estimated
fiscal impact $28 million in 01-02 and $70 million in 02-03.
Assembly - No provision.
Conference Committee - Adopted Assembly position. No change to
current law.
Hub Airline Tax
Exemption. Governor proposed an exemption from property and ad
valorem taxes for all property owned by an air carrier company that operates
a hub facility in Wisconsin, effective January 1, 2002.
Joint Finance - Adopted Governor's position with modifications,
including a retroactive effective date of January 1, 2001. Also creates a
sum sufficient GPR appropriation for making a transfer to the transportation
fund, beginning on July 1, 2001 and on July 1 of every fiscal year
thereafter.
Senate/Assembly/Conference Committee - No change to Joint Finance.
Governor - Signed into law.
Utility Shared
Revenue.
Senate - No provision.
Assembly - Adopted a provision altering the utility shared revenue
tax that would offer financial incentives to municipalities who agree to
host new power plants.
Conference Committee - Adopted Senate position.
Economic
Development
Technology
Zones. The
Governor proposed creating up to 20 technology zones to promote the
development and expansion of high-technology businesses in Wisconsin. Up to
$5 million in credits could be claimed in each zone for a total of $100
million. Each zone would be active for 10 years.
Joint Finance - Approved the creation of up to nine technology zones
with $3 million in credits per year. Additionally, each zone created after
the first three would need Joint Finance approval.
Senate - Deleted provision.
Assembly - Adopted a provision that would allow Commerce to create up
to 18 technology zones as well as a technology zone in the City of
Marshfield and one agricultural development zone. Commerce could not,
however, create more than three zones without the approval of Joint Finance.
Up to $5 million in credits may be claimed in each zone.
Conference Committee - Adopted a provision that would limit Commerce
to creating nine zones all with Joint Finance approval. Also requires one
agricultural development zone.
Governor - Vetoed the Joint Finance approval requirement. Signed into
law the creation of nine technology zones and one agricultural development
zone.
International
Division. Governor requested funding for an international liaison
position in the Department of Commerce's Division of International and
Export Services.
Joint Finance - Deleted the provision and also deleted the funding
and all positions for the entire Division of International and Export
Services.
Senate - Adopted Joint Finance position.
Assembly - Restored the funding and positions for Commerce's Division
of International and Export Services.
Conference Committee - Adopted the Assembly position with the
requirement of a performance and financial audit of the Division by the
Legislative Audit Bureau.
Governor - Vetoed the required audit by the Legislative Audit Bureau.
Tax Incremental
Financing.
Senate - Adopted several modifications to the TIF law. The Senate
included all of the recommendations from the Governor's TIF Working Group.
Assembly - No provision.
Conference Committee - Adopted Assembly position.
Milwaukee
Development Opportunity Zone. Governor proposed a provision that
designates an area in the City of Milwaukee as a Development Opportunity
Zone. This provision would help retain a major national retailer's regional
headquarters with 700 jobs at an average annual salary of $50,000 in
Milwaukee. The maximum amount of tax credits that could be claimed by the
businesses in the zone would be $4.7 million.
Joint Finance - Adopted Governor's recommendation.
Senate - Adopted a provision that provided that the tax credits in
the Milwaukee Development Opportunity Zone that are claimed based on the
partnership's company's or corporation's activities in proportion to their
ownership interest may offset the tax attributable to their income.
Assembly - Adopted Joint Finance and Governor's position.
Conference Committee - Included the Senate provision and adopted a technical
amendment to clarify that non-corporate businesses in the zone could claim
tax credits in the zone.
Governor - Vetoed the Senate provision. Signed original intent into
law.
Beloit
Development Opportunity Zone. Senate - Adopted a provision that
would require the Department of Commerce to designate an area in the City of
Beloit as a Development Opportunity Zone that would exist for seven years.
Any corporation that located and conducted economic activity in the zone
would be eligible to claim the development zone tax credit. The maximum
amount of tax credit that could be claimed would be $4.7 million.
Assembly/Conference Committee - Adopted Senate provision.
Governor - Signed into law.
Transportation
Transportation
Facilities Economic Assistance (TEA) Program.
Governor proposed an increase of $5.25 million SEG over the biennium for the
Program.
Joint Finance - Deleted the additional funding to maintain the
program at the base level of $3.5 million per year. Joint Finance required
DOT to give priority funding to applicants who are willing to accept a loan
for all or a part of the state share of the costs of the project. Also
required DOT to allocate at lease 20% of SEG and any future loan repayment
funds provided for the program to making loans.
Senate - Adopted Joint Finance position.
Assembly - Provided an additional $250,000 SEG annually to the
program, increasing the base level of funding to $3,750,000 annually.
Conference Committee - Provided an additional $125,000 SEG annually
to the program, increasing the base level of funding to $3,625,000 annually.
Also included a provision that requires DOT to provide $410,000 from the TEA
Program in January 2002 to Brown County, the City of Green Bay, and the
Village of Ashwaubenon for costs associated with the CTH VK/Lombardi Avenue
project. The provision also specifies that the current law requirements
related to grants made under the TEA program, including the local matching
grant be waived.
Governor - Vetoed the $410,000 set aside for Brown County, the City
of Green Bay, and the Village of Ashwaubenon. Maintained Conference
Committee funding level of $3.625 million annually. The Governor also vetoed
the loan v. grant provision.
Marquette
Interchange. Governor proposed creating a special appropriation
for the Marquette Interchange of $133 million over the biennium.
Joint Finance - Increased funding to $160.6 million with a base level
of future funding at $45.9 million annually.
Senate - Adopted a provision that required an interchange at
Plankinton Avenue and that all work must be done on a 24-hour basis. Also
required that 5% of the total amount expended annually be paid to minority
businesses.
Assembly - Adopted a provision that would require DOT to design the
reconstruction of the Marquette Interchange and I-94 in Milwaukee and
Waukesha Counties to allow for expansion of capacity for vehicular traffic
on those highways to meet the projected vehicular traffic capacity needs, as
determined by DOT for 30 years following the reconstruction of those
highways.
Conference Committee - Adopted the Assembly provision and the Senate
provision as it related to the Plankinton Avenue interchange and
round-the-clock work.
Governor - Signed into law.
Transportation
Fund. 2001 Wisconsin Act 16 does not include any increase in gas
tax or registration fees, both of which are the major revenue sources for
the Transportation Fund. A Coalition of transportation stakeholders has been
advocating "broadening the base" of funding for the Transportation
Fund by dedicating growth in sales tax in the sale of automobiles, auto
repair, etc. to the Transportation Fund. This would shift General Purpose
Revenue (GPR) to the Transportation Fund.
Joint Finance - No provision.
Senate - No provision.
Assembly - Adopted a provision to transfer sales tax on vehicles to
the Transportation Fund beginning in the second year of the next biennium
(2004-05). Also, five separate accounts within the Transportation Fund would
be created effective July 1, 2003. The five are state and local highways;
public transportation; aeronautics; multimodal; and, operations.
Conference Committee - No change to Joint Finance.
|