The Hamilton Consulting Group
|spacePolitical TidbitsNews ClipsUpdatesTracking ReportInformation ServicesCalendarsHomespace|
Government Relations
Information Services
Areas of Expertise
Staff
Clients
Contact Us
Opt-in / Opt-out
-
.
.
 

Mercury

2006 - 2008

Updated August 2008

2008 Documents

State board approves tighter mercury limits: Manitowoc Herald Times, June 26, 2008. Businesses say utilities will have to spend tens of millions of dollars to comply, driving up electric bills.

Wisconsin board OKs 90% cut in mercury emissions; fishing may benefit: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, June 25, 2008. Utilities would be forced to install new pollution controls that are estimated to cost $38 million to $221 million a year for mercury and other pollutants.

Status of Suit to Compel DNR Compliance with Jobs Creation Act: The Hamilton Consulting Group, June 2008. Dane County Court Punts Rather than Resolves Critical Legal Issues.

Suit to Compel DNR Compliance with Key Rulemaking Procedures: DeWitt, Ross and Stevens Press Release, Apr. 28, 2008.

Aggregate Producers of Wisconsin, Inc., et. al. v. Wisconsin Department of Environmental Resources: Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Apr. 28, 2008.

Affidavit in Support of Petition: Apr. 28, 2008.

WMC Economic Impact Report Petition, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Mar. 7, 2008.

Sec. Morgan's Denial of Economic Impact Petition, Wisconsin Dept. of Administration, Mar. 20, 2008.

News Articles/Press Releases

Business Groups Take Stand to Defend Job Creation Act Regulatory Reform: WMC Insight, May 16, 2008. The DNR’s failure to follow statutory rulemaking procedure has significant consequences: it resulted in the denial of a key economic impact analysis of the rule requested by WMC.

Lawsuit seeks data on mercury rules' impact: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Apr.30, 2008. Regulations that would limit mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants have not yet been advanced by the Department of Natural Resources, but they're already the subject of a lawsuit.

Business groups sue DNR over pollution rules: The Cap Times, Apr. 29, 2008. The lawsuit is not challenging the merit or substance of the proposed rule, the organizations said in a news release. Instead, they are asking the DNR to comply with public notice requirements of the Job Creation Act of 2004.

EPA: Ruling will hinder coal plans: Des Moines Register, Feb. 29, 2008. If the tougher limits go back into effect, plants could spend more on scrubbers and baghouses, potentially affecting electricity prices.

Mercury ruling is victory for Wisconsin (opinion): Sheboygan Press, Feb. 14, 2008. Federal appeals court ruled against the EPA's way of handling emissions standards.

State wins ruling on mercury reduction: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Feb. 8, 2008. Go-ahead for tougher rules targets coal-fired power plants.

DNR opens door for strong mercury rule: Wisconsin Environment, Mar. 28, 2007. The Natural Resources Board today authorized for public comment a range of options for proposed changes to the state’s mercury rule.

Related Documents

Comments: AM-32-05: Revisions to Chapter NR 446 relating to the Federal Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) and Additional Wisconsin Provisions: Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, June 11, 2007.

WMC Comments References:

Evaluation of the Compliance Implications to Wisconsin Electric Generators of Meeting the Wisconsin Proposed Mercury: Prepared for Center for Energy and Economic Development, June 2007.

Integrated Approaches to Managing Mercury: Electric Power Research Institute, September 2006.

Wisconsin Utilities’ Response to Citizens’ Mercury Petition: June 11, 2007.

Fate and Transport of Mercury in the Environment: Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume III), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1997.

Chapter 8, Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Clean Air Mercury Report: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 2005.

Modeling Deposition of Atmospheric Mercury in Wisconsin to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI): (Report CP136-02-1), Palo Alto, CA, 2002.

DNR Initial Proposed Mercury Rulemaking Order: March 15, 2007.

Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Steam Generating Units; Final Rule: 70 FR 28605, May 18, 2005.

Revision of December 2000 Regulatory Finding on the Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and the Removal of Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units From the Section 112(c) List; Final Rule: 70 FR 15993, March 29, 2005.

Source Attribution of Atmospheric Mercury: Plenary Session, Mon., Aug. 7, 2006

Health Risks and Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury: Plenary Session, Tue., Aug. 8 2006

Recovery of Mercury-Contaminated Fisheries: Plenary Session, Wed., Aug. 9, 2006

Socioeconomic Consequences of Mercury Pollution: Plenary Session, Thur., Aug. 10, 2006

| Political Tidbits | News Clips | Updates | Tracking Reports | Info Services | Calendars | Home |

© 2007 Hamilton Consulting Group
All rights reserved.